comité d'évaluation de docimologie en - FMT
24623
page-template-default,page,page-id-24623,bridge-core-2.8.9,qode-page-transition-enabled,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-title-hidden,footer_responsive_adv,qode-theme-ver-27.3,qode-theme-bridge,disabled_footer_bottom,qode_header_in_grid,wpbdp-with-button-styles,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.7.0,vc_responsive

Committees -> Docimology evaluation committee


 

Docimology evaluation committee

Name of committee

Docimology evaluation committee

Committee Chair (s)

Kalthoum Kallel

kallelkalthoum@gmail.com
Description

 


Historic :
– Creation of the Evaluation Committee: December 2008.
– 2008-2009

  • Redaction of the Evaluation Charter
  • Visite du Bureau d’Evaluation de l’Université de Montréal (2 membres)
  • Élaboration des outils de l’évaluation : questionnaires d’évaluation


– 2009-2010
Pilot experience: DCEM2 assessment: teaching at the faculty, internships and exams (distribution, retrieval and analysis of thousands of questionnaires). Heavy experience
– 2010-2011

  • Prioritize the evaluation of internships thanks to the logistical support of the Internship Directorate in the distribution and retrieval of questionnaires as well as the capture of student responses
  • Incorporation of evaluation concepts, initiated by the late Professor Zawash to verify the marks, within the evaluation committee
  • Organization into three sub-committees :
    – A training evaluation subcommittee
    – A teaching evaluation subcommittee
    – An exam evaluation subcommittee: docimology
Objective

 

  • Evaluation of training grounds
  • Evaluation of theoretical teaching
  • Evaluation of exam questions
Previous events

 

  • Regular organization of awareness seminars with teachers and students
  • Regular organization of docimology training seminars
Future projects

 

  • Improvement of the docimological procedure with discussion of the docimological analysis, at each examination session, with the teachers concerned
  • Improvement in the communication of evaluation results by feedback, by specialty, to all teachers of the specialty